9/11 Truthers Get OK to give evidence to a Grand Jury

They are saying they have the irrefutable evidence to prove the Twin Towers and Build 7 were brought down by controlled demolition which would have taken months to plan and execute. That means the Pentagon was also part of the plan, it was not a terrorist attack and it had to be an inside job. They also expect future indictments.

Advertisements

The Jewish Onslaught

The Jewish Onslaught is a book by Dr. Tony Martin, a Caribbean black and Black Studies Tenured Professor at Wellesley College, now deceased, who had challenged the Jewish power structure. He tells his story of how the Jews tried to suppress his teachings of the blacks and Jewish relationship going back to the financial controls of the Atlantic slave trade to their involvement in manipulating the 1960s civil rights movement.

Both the controls of media and Hollywood is exposed as well as the concentration of wealth in N. American Jewry.

A talk by Martin at a small club on his book:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEoBYOy3tQM

His book listing: https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Onslaught-Despatches-Wellesley-Battlefront/dp/0912469307

Merkel Strongly Suggests joining NWO

Many people still do not believe, even though it has been mentioned by numerous others before Merkel, in the existence of a group of people pushing for a New World Order (NWO), claiming those who do believe it, are conspiracy theorists. See if what she says in the link below changes your mind.

For those that have seen how those pushing for the NWO operate and manipulate governments and the markets, we have been observing their methods for decades.

There is only one way to stop them and by doing so we will also drain the swamp. Many think the takeover is coming very soon. Centralized power has killed many societies and now they want to create one government at the world level. To me, this is more than a scary thought. I would like to meet the architect and see the proposed Constitution and Bill of Rights. I know I’m dreaming, rights what are they.

These people are the ones that control Donald Trump and the Clintons and most heads of state around the world, like Merkel. There is an old staying that he who has the gold, makes the rule and the Zionist central bankers have the proverbial gold. Actually, they do also have the real stuff, both gold and silver like J.P. Morgan Chase has been buying up like crazy, but they operate their activities using fiat paper currency which many think is about to go down the toilet. Your toilet paper will likely be worth more than the dollar bill when the defaults start to occur again as they did in 2008. This is when most think the takeover will occur and it’s coming sooner than you think. The current system will not be saved this time, because quite frankly it’s to far gone.

If you do not have any gold and silver, it is your own fault. It’s still relatively cheap.

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/253689-2018-12-29-angela-merkel-nation-states-must-give-up-sovereignty-to-new.htm?From=News

You Want To Do What?

With the Federal budget especially, but also state and local, if Citizens could pick and choose which social programs they want to pay for and how much they want to contribute to each one, it would at least give us some semblance of a democracy. 

Look, there is no one greater than I that fears the voting majority because they are not being educated and there is no reason for the ruling class to educate them, and actually just the opposite. The stupider the voters are the more they can be taken advantage of.   

With politicians making the decisions, knowing darn well they are serving the wealthy special interests instead of the majority, the benefits of our democratic republic are negated. We’re simply an oligarchy, controlled by wealthy special interests pretending to be a democratic Republic like the Roman Empire and ALL other nation-states before us.

Can you imagine politicians having to actually prove to the voters that a war is needed with the citizens getting to decide if the truth is really being told to us? Would we have engaged in Desert Storm or Syria?

We have the technology to do this, it’s the political will I am worried about. These putzes can’t even get a simple 1 man 1 vote election correct. That’s because sadly we have the inmates running the asylum; oh right, we’re calling it a swamp now. Elon Musk and SpaceX can send rockets into space and land them safely, and we can get a friggin computer system to count the votes correctly?   

The Sliding Scale of Socialism

Socialism; what is it anyway?       

Socialism can be explained as the number of total social programs enacted, times the financial costs to taxpayers; the more costs associated with the programs and their total numbers, as a percentage of gross domestic product, the greater the level of socialism.  So it’s a sliding scale depending on how many total social policies the government has enacted.

In simpler terms, the larger the government is, the more taxes are needed to pay for all the social programs and the more socialist your society would be considered. The lesser the number of taxes and social programs, the less socialistic your society would be considered. Many economists suggest, the larger the government and greater costs of the required taxes, the less per capita production there is; which would be an inverse relationship. However, we’re not here to debate the ideologies. We’re here just to understand what it really is and means and define the term socialism.       

Governments usually provide various services that are an expense to society. Although many deem socialism and communism as antonyms, this author prefers to look at socialism as a percentage of the economy where government services and products are provided, to the percentage provided by the private sector production. This is not perfect for a variety of reasons but can be used as a generality but surely don’t use it to compare different countries.  There are many things that make countries wealthy and there are many things that make countries poor.  If we knew what these were, we would have likely fixed the poor countries already. Lots of theories abound, but never take them a fact.  Knowing what is in the best interest of the majority is a fool’s errand.            

The primary deference between communism and socialism is private property rights. When there are no private property rights, the government then owns everything, and everyone worked for the government, that is communism. Whereas Venezuela, with its private-public partnership as many called it, is a mixed economic model as economist call it. It is a combination of a robust government sector and a substantive private sector, trying to work in harmony. This is a problem for a number of reasons, as Venezuela is experiencing but once that a discussion for another day.    

The bigger the government is without property ownership being held by the State, the more socialistic. Over the last 30 years or so, the government has been buying up more and more real estate so once homes, lands, businesses, commercial buildings, and rents are owned by the government, that is communism with everyone works for the government. Under socialism, private property rights are still in the hands of theCitizens, it’s just that the property and various activities are taxed to payfor the government, The more total taxation as a percentage of total productiveoutput, GDP, the more socialistic your society would be.       

As an example, many may not consider prisons and jails to be part of socialism, because it is a needed entity yet the fewer people incarcerated the less socialism and fewer government costs there would be. Of course, the more people you have incarcerated the larger the correction system must be to manage, feed, cloth, shelter and try to educate the prisoners.    

The balance between the size of the private sector and the size of government differs in societies with mixed economies, thus it can vary and therefore is a sliding scale.   

Socialism can be visualized in this authors opinion as a sliding scale. With minimal government (libertarianism) to the left and communism, total government to the far right. The Democratic Party would be right of the Republican Party “theoretically”, but in reality, they are very close to one another and much closer today to the far-right communism than to the far-left,  libertarianism.      

This is one of the great misunderstandings as to which political ideology is far right and which one is far left.  As an example, fascism appears to occur when the costs of government get too large in relation to the amount of production or GDP, the gross domestic product as I noted previously. The major fascist nations of Germany, Italy, and Japan during WWII all were highly socialistic with high levels of militarism compounding the size and costs of government. To enforce all the taxation as GDP wains from the expansion of the government sector, those in government enforcement become harsher and penalties such as incarcerations and fines stiffer as wages drop and taxes rise. Basically, the government is squeezing the profits out of the private sector to pay for the increased costs of government. Additionally, in the 20thcentury, with the advent of fiat currencies put in place around the world,governments could simply print more money to pay for the additional costs of an expanding government, but this debases the currency without increased productivity causing the devaluation of the currency which results in eventual price inflation, the rising of manufacturing and consumer prices. Where this author believes government central planners make a huge mistake, is crediting the production by private companies contracting with the government, as part of the GDP calculations when a bridge, jet fighter or a school is an expense to society. As an example, if all children were primarily educated via home computers, the costs of building schools could be eliminated. I am not saying this is a good or bad idea, its just an example of identifying costs and expenses associated with the government where the physical school itself is built by some private sector construction company but actually paid for by taxes. Today, we add the costs of building the school as GDP when it is an expense to our society making it appear that our society is more productive than it really is. A society cannot be more prosperous by increasing expenses as our society has seen since the 2008 Great Recession, with the cost of the Federal Government alone reaching $4 trillion annually with $1 trillion of that being printed with interest charges passed onto the taxpayers. 

To learn some more about it go to wikipedia and evaluate my analysis with theirs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism