How grand of them to give us back our right to use the herb cannabis, they usurped eighty years ago, on October 2, 1937, House Bill 6385: The Marihuana Tax Act. Yet a large group of politicians still voted against it. Only 5 Republicans voted for it and 6 Democrats voted against the bill to decriminalize a naturally occurring herb that people have utilized for thousands of years, coincidentally during a period when many Marxists were, just so happened to be, infiltrating our government. Sadly, some are saying, it is “unlikely” to pass the Senate.
Think of our Constitution as our foundational rule of law, yet we have allowed it to be “unlawfully” abrogated to such a very high degree that many are making a strong case that we are no longer a lawfully constituted Republic. If true, is there a way to restore our society?
Are there viable solutions, has been the long-standing question and it appears playing in the arenas they control, the courts and legislatures, have been extremely futile. They surely are not going to ask somebody like me to be the Secretary of the Treasury, that’s reserved for the wealthy banking and investment interests. They obviously need the revenue or they wouldn’t be reinstating this right.
Qualified Immunity is one of the major problems. Even when a government employee or official usurps somebody’s rights, they have commandeered the Courts and they most often eliminate any liability. Even Big Pharma is exempted from liability through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that has already paid out over $4.4 billion, so far, in claims. Most people don’t know about this, so they would not even know to make a claim.
The Constitution clearly states, that those that break their Oaths to support, protect and defend the Constitution, “shall Not Hold Office” and many in both major political Parties, more like gangs today, are complicit. Many people such as the group who voted against reinstating the above right, are actually complicit in destroying the very Constitution they have taken an oath to uphold. This is by definition an insurrection. When two or more people are involved in an insurrection, it is “treason”. We The People and our government have literally been overthrown from within, by the two most powerful political gangs and they are both highly violent and corrupt.
The Constitution says they shall not hold office and,
It says that any monetary claim to Congress to put down an insurrection, if successful, shall not be challenged.
So the provisions of restoring our constituted provisions are4 in the Constitution itself. We just need a large enough group to restore it.
In the below link, Andrew Colesanti, a founding member of the Counter-Insurgency Studies and Observation Group (COINSOG) makes the case that Biden and Harris by virtue of them campaigning to “legislatively” void the 2nd Amendment, for the right to bear arms, have thus broken their Oaths and thus should not have placed themselves on the ballot for the election. The Constitution gives us two lawful methods of amending the Constitution and both Biden and Harris have not advocated these methods and instead, have and are still attempted to unlawfully subvert the Constitution and its intent to protect the rights of the Citizens through unlawful legislative means. https://therightofchoice.wordpress.com/?p=158
Can you imagine a large group of COINSOG Citizens arresting Biden and Harris for insurrection and treason and putting them on trial? Right now, there are not enough members and obviously, security and privacy are of great importance to both the usurpers and we the people if we partake in such civil actions. Or we can maintain the status quo that appears to be taking us down a potentially violent path of incoherent civil unrest.
2. The Right of Choice; the website to the above link is about creating a substitute tax return that allows the individual taxpayers to choose which government programs they want or do not want to pay for with their taxes. With over 120 different taxes and regulatory fees, the government surely has plenty of discretionary money to pay for the less popular programs. If the IRS denies the use of the substitute returns, which is likely, the taxpayers, simply removes that section from their return and refiles it to meet their perceived income tax obligations. If they deny the substitute returns, this of course provides the Citizens a very interesting legal and constitutional challenge through the courts. The publicity alone would be worth the effort and a much easier sell to the average American to join in the movement. Seeing who pushes back and their arguments against such an initiative will surely be enlightening.
These are some of the largest contributors to the Democratic Party and the total amount they recently contributed.
Paloma Funds, Donald Sussman, CEO, $21,613,800. The is the founder and Chief Investment Officer of the Paloma Funds and the founder of New China Capital Management LLC. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Hall, a member of the Board of Directors of ProPublica, and an Honorary Trustee of the Ethical Culture Fieldston School. His company Paloma Partners, was the largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 . Sussman was born to a Jewish family in June 1946, the son of Beatrice (née Zimmerman) and William Sussman. His father was a real estate developer.They were the single largest individual contributors to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016
Renaissance Technologies, James Harris Simons Founder and Chairman $16,543,000. James Harris Simons was born on April 25, 1938 to an American Jewish family, the only child of Marcia (née Kantor) and Matthew Simons, and raised in Brookline, Massachusetts. His father owned a shoe factory. When James Simons was a teenager, he worked a job in the basement stockroom of a garden supply store. His inefficiency at the job resulted in his demotion as a floor sweeper., Renaissance was the 3rd largest individual contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .
Saban Capital Group, Haim Saban $12,283,411 is an American investment firm based in Los Angeles, California focused on media, entertainment, and communications investments. Formed in 2010 Saban Capital Group owns Saban Films, part of Univision Communications, and part of Celestial Tiger Entertainment. He was a part owner of FOX Entertainments, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Israeli American Council. Saban Capital was the 4th largest individual contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .
Newsweb Corporation. Fred Eychaner, (born c. 1945) is an American entrepreneur and philanthropist.Eychaner is the Chairman of Newsweb Corporation. He was included in Chicago magazine’s 2014 list of the 100 most powerful Chicagoans. In 2005, the Chicago Tribune estimated his wealth at $500 million. In 2015, he was inducted into the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame.Eychaner is a major donor to Democratic campaigns, gay rights advocacy groups, and arts organizations. m Newweb was the 5th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .
Soros Fund Management George Soros $10,556,793 is a private American investment management firm. It is currently structured as a family office but formerly as a hedge fund. The firm was founded in 1969 by George Soros and in 2010 was reported to be one of the most profitable firms in the hedge fund industry, averaging a 20% annual rate of return over four decades. They are headquartered at 250 West 55th Street in New York. Soros was born in Budapest in the Kingdom of Hungary to a prosperous non-observant Jewish family, who, like many upper-middle class Hungarian Jews at the time, were uncomfortable with their roots. Soros has wryly described his home as a Jewish antisemitic home. The Soros Fund was the 6th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.
ASANA, Justin Rosenstein and Dustin Moskovitz formally a co-founder of Facebook. $6,005,556
Lone Pine Capital. Steven Mandel $5,015,300 is an American-based hedge fund headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut, established in 1997 by its president and portfolio manager, Stephen Mandel. The firm has offices in London, New York City, and San Francisco.
They were the 8th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Almost all the above information came from either Wikipedia or the company website.
Bundlers are people with friends in high places who, after bumping against personal contribution limits, turn to those friends, associates, and, well, anyone who’s willing to give, and deliver the checks to the candidate.
The Federal Election Commission requires disclosure only of those bundlers who are registered lobbyists. Beyond that, it’s up to the candidate. The Clinton campaign is releasing information about bundlers who raised over $100,000 (see list below); the campaign does not specify how much each of these individuals has raised beyond that. The Trump campaign has released no information about its bundlers whatsoever.
Together, 1,129 Extremely wealthy were directing at least $112,300,000 for Clinton’s election efforts — money that has gone into the coffers of her campaign as well as the Democratic National Committee.
Lawyers & Lobbyists, $21.9M, Unknown, $22.3M, Misc Business, $19M, Other, $17.2M, Defense, $100K, Labor, $100K, Transportation, $900K, Agribusiness, $1.2M, Construction, $1.4M, Energy & Natural Resources, $2M, Ideological/Single-Issue, $2.7M, Health, $5M, Communications/Electronics, $13.9M, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate, $31.5M, Top Economic Sectors of Clinton Bundlers, 2016
Top Industries of Clinton Bundlers
# of Bundlers
Employer Listed/Category Unknown
Securities & Investment
*The “Contributions” column indicates the total amount that the bundlers and their spouses have given to all federal candidates, parties and PACs in all election cycles since 1990.
This is a copy of the certified letter that has been sent to President Donald Trump. The purpose as you will read, is to report to him as required under the Constitution, any and all known insurrections, treasons, and plots against the United States or “the Laws thereof”. According to the Constitution and the following United States Statute, it is a crime for any elected official to ignore the evidence and do nothing about it. This Group has been around for almost 30 years and have experienced my examples of usurpations and criminal acts against the Citizens and laws of this country and have noticed numerous Presidents and other Public Officials of the crimes. It is now time for the Citizens to use the laws and Constitution to indict those involved. The question then becomes, how many are involved?
COUNTER INSURGENCY OBSERVATION & STUDIES GROUP (COINSOG)
8409 N. Oak River Way, Hernando, Florida 34442
To: Office of the President
Donald Trump, President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D. C., 20500
Title 18 U.S.C. § 2382 Notice of Misprision of Treason
Qualified claim by COINSOG for appropriations under the rules of necessity and delegated authority of the 9th Amendment and Section 4 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America to payments, bounties and pensions for services to put down rebellion and insurrection against the duly constituted Republic its Bill of Rights & Constitution.
Dear President Trump,
Referenced law requires anyone owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason or insurrections against the authority of the United States, or the laws thereof to make known the same to the President, some Judge of the United States, or to the Governor or Judges or Justices of a particular State. What I report to you is ongoing within the fifty States, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealths. I must report to you, that most all Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States except for the Honorable Justice Thomas, most Federal, State, County and local Public Officials, Judges, Justices and their paramilitaries have used public appropriations, their public offices, vacating their Oaths of Office intentionally in the process, to defy Federal and State laws with sufficient force and effect during times pertinent, so as to deny the power of the United States Constitution with their “Qualified Immunity” schemes. Thereby they, each of them, became insurgents against that Constitution as prescribed by Sections 3 (insurrection clause) and 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment using the definition of Federal case entitled, “In Re Charge to Grand Jury, N.D., Ill., 1894, 62 F. 828.”
It has become abundantly clear that all Federal, State, County and local Courts in America are exacting their qualified immunity schemes to bolster a Police State apparatus whose mission is to pacify the American civilian population into submission of usurped powers thereby creating an arbitrary government. This is evidence, that these Courts no longer serve to benefit the civilian populations, instead victimizing them by the arrogant and unlawful violations of their natural civil and constitutional rights, thereby an insurrection has taken hold. Therefore, the best course of action is a counter insurgency under Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment directed at those cited in Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment who have violated or vacated their Oaths of Office, thereby they shall not hold office.
We the People have heard all the arguments in favor of qualified immunity, however not one argument negates the fact that it is insurrection, treason and conspiracy by Public Officials within the Judiciary that gave unchecked force to their paramilitaries in order to capriciously victimize the American civilian population. We all now witness the overwhelming call by segments of the civilian population and Public Officials to de-fund and even abolish police primarily because of the protections extended to them by the treasonous qualified immunity scheme. This matter Mr. President could be defused simply by the execution of an Presidential Executive Order abolishing qualified immunity, restructuring of police duties, and responsibilities and not as paramilitaries.
Then there is the pressing question; “is America a duly constituted Republic or has it become a Police State Junta” with minimal protections of individual rights? Not unlike those brutal Juntas that were trained at the Old School of the Americas, WINSEC or of late American paramilitaries trained by the IDF in classic violent military pacification of civilian populations to force them into submission of usurpation’s, notwithstanding the Bill of Rights and Constitution.
The arming of the current Police State Apparatus with military arms and implements of war became apparent with the enactment of the Gun Control ACT of May 1986 as the treasonous disarming of peaceful American civilians took hold as if it was a war upon their natural civil and constitutional rights. This has become the status quo, strengthened by the insurgent’s qualified immunity scheme. Then there is the fact that nowhere within the text of the 2nd Amendment can one find the phrase “but in a manner to be prescribed by law” evidencing why the usurpers covet their treasonous blanket of qualified immunity.
Coupled with qualified immunity “bound by an oath of office” as defined in the COINAGE ACT, a blanket bond scheme was developed, solely intended to pass the financial liability of bad actors in public office and their para-military enforces onto the taxpayers, thus unlawfully indemnifying themselves from personal liability. There has been debate about whether or not any civilian uprising against the aforementioned treasonous insurgents cited within Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th would be rebellion or insurrection against a duly constituted authority, in of itself? The best qualified answer we have found to this question is: EXCERPT’ reason for the militia; “to stand against any arbitrary government and its usurped powers as reiterated by Supreme Court Justice Story in Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States Vol. 3 at pp. 746-747 (1833). It is surely reasonable to conclude that in a nation with fundamental liberties, a direct remedy must be afforded those victimized, coerced and harassed by these insurgents and their para-military protectors.
Evidence of an insurrection is well documented, from within the various government bodies, using the qualified immunity scheme to deny the liberty and justice, intended by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. So now the question is, “has government at all levels become arbitrary?” The answer to this pressing question lies within but not limited to the following facts: two former Presidents were served with Notice of Misprision of Treason by members of COINSOG, as it relates to the courts they chose to aid and abet by their inactions. COINSOG members also brought forth cases citing insurrection, treason, and conspiracy into U.S. District Courts within several states of the union, again to no avail. Those states were New Mexico, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Texas, South Dakota as well as the SCOTUS, even though early law required as mandatory “not discretionary” the SCOTUS review all cases citing insurrection. Then we have the fact “Congress knew or should have known of the unconstitutional qualified immunity schemes and the negative impact it would and has had on the civilian population, many of whom rot in jails who have and are denied their constitutional rights. Not one meaningful or honest attempt from within has occurred to stop the ongoing insurrection and treason from within. “Thereby it can be said an arbitrary government has indeed taken hold.”
All of America who care to observe, as well as the members of the Counter Insurgency Studies & Observation Group (COINSOG) have witnessed countless court cases brought forth by victims of the insurgent’s unjust qualified immunity schemes to “try” to establish accountability for the ongoing usurpations of their natural civil and constitutional rights, only too further suffer from the “qualified immunity scheme used to deny, again and again any liability or accountability whatsoever and it still continues.”
Even you Mr. President, I truly suspect, was unaware of those engaged in the insurrection and treason, as it relates to “RED FLAG LAWS”. The MO was seizing the guns first from honest Citizens and worry about the due process later. However, how are we the people to expect due process of law, while the blanket of treasonous qualified immunity is protected by our courts and instead, used by usurpers to trample upon the natural, civil and constitutional rights of the America population?
I would be remis if I did not point out, there are other insurgents and their component forces at work 24-7, some of which are allegedly led by convicted Marxist terrorist, one of many terrorists pardoned by BILL CLINTON and ruthlessly targeting you Mr. President and the segment of America that supports you. The time has arrived to not only invoke Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment, to route out those insurgents who have disavowed their oaths of office, as cited in Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment and the INSURRECTION ACT. To route out all insurgent component forces that threaten not only you Mr. President, but the election process, and the duly constituted Republic, its Bill of Rights, Constitution and those American’s who support you.
In conclusion: Mr. President, common sense dictates, no one wants civil unrest, a civil war or perhaps a revolution. We must stop the usurpations exacted by embedded insurgents from within our own government and their component forces and the social unrest it is causing across the nation. If we do nothing” it will likely continue. The only logical and more peaceable path left to the American civilian population is to invoke Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment under the rules of necessity and delegated authority of the 9th Amendment. Thereby “COINSOG defined, as other armed forces of the United States of America”, reiterates its claim to payments, bounties, and pensions to put down the identified insurrection under Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America.
It is not hard to acknowledge
that when Judges are chosen politically, the Judges will become as much a politician
as those selecting them. The
confirmation hearings of Judges have become a political battle so adverse and
contentious, that they are partially being fought through the legal system
Of course, this is the worst
thing that could ever occur in any society, but it has been the rule throughout
human history. The Judges have always been a rubber stamp for the ruling class
and the various factions want their candidate to be the one confirmed. The should give you an indication of just how
arbitrary judicial decisions have been and can be.
“With Justice for None” is also the
title of a book by the best-selling author and prominent defence Attorney Gerry
Spence, now deceased, who wrote a highly critical review of our legal
“A scathing indictment of how law is taught, practiced, and
administered in this country . . . One of the best books ever written on the
law.”—The Denver Post
“Renowned trial lawyer Gerry Spence takes an in-depth
look at the American justice system and reveals a terrible truth: If you don’t
have power or money, then you likely won’t receive justice either. The wealthy
buy their way out of trouble, while the poor are punished. In an effort to
combat this corruption, the author devises a number of reforms, tackling issues
in every area of the system from law school to the courtroom.”
This is the truth about our legal
system, and I have read and heard hundreds of stories over the years providing additional
evidence. If you have the money to pay the extravagant prices the average
Attorneys charges, and many of them are “poor to average” at best in their
abilities to acquire justice, you will get better treatment that those that
don’t have the money. Many of them are highly unscrupulous and will take your
money and then do hardly anything to help you. And God forbid, having to use a
Public Defender who is an indirect drain on the pension funds of the Judges and
other government employees that work the justice system, I call Courthouse
IMHO, with the States and
American BAR Associations, they have created a quasi power cartel full of
individuals with highly questionable integrity. In 1820, Thomas Jefferson apparently
agreed when he wrote; “The Judiciary of the United States is the
subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working underground to undermine the
foundation of our confederated fabric.… the Federal Judiciary; an irresponsible
body (for impeachment is scarcely a scarecrow) working like gravity by night
and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow and advance it’s
noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be
usurped from the States, and the government of all be consolidated into one…. when
all government….in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as
the centre of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one
government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government
from which we separated.
Our Judiciary, has allowed, until
just this week of 3/15/2019 the “extraordinary” excessive confiscation of money
and property through unconstitutional Asset Forfeiture actions protected by the
8Th Amendment to be standard operations by local, state and Federal
Law enforcement agencies. Finally, after decades perhaps even a century or so, of
unlawful confiscations of property and money from the Citizens by government
prosecutors and law enforcement, the Supreme Count finally has upheld and
protected one of out constitutional rights, in a case Timbs v Indiana after the appellate determination by the Indiana Supreme Court, affirmed
an action so unconscionable that it boggles the imagination.
We all know our political system
is inherently flawed because of the effects of money on the system but unless
you follow some of the lower and Supreme Court decisions carefully you are not
necessarily cognizant of the Courts poor behavior.
I think they got Roe vs Wade
right and many others but when it comes to the governments taxing and other
confiscatory powers to fine, penalize and imprison, it is as if it is a
profitable business to them.
I’ll give you one example. During
the foreclosure epidemic, the South Florida Courts literally became a purely
arbitrary system with a “rocket docket” mentality as it was being called by
Attorneys, forgoing most of the rules of law and this was a determination from
the top down, with the Senior Judges telling their subordinates to clear their
docket, ruling against the homeowners almost 100% of the time. Come to find out
the Judges have their own pension fund and they had invested in some of the
mortgage loans sold be Wall Street and the banks.
Despite the various frauds
initiated by the banks and mortgage lenders, homeowners lost their homes almost
100% of the time unless the banks made some sort of deal with the homeowners. Here in So. Florida we still have huge
numbers of foreclosures still on the dockets and it is often the banks
themselves slowing the process. As a Realtor, I think they are trying to slowly
bring these properties on the market so that the keep the inventories low and
prices remain high but that’s another issue for another day.
The rocket docket mentality still
exists as far as the Judges siding with the banks, but the legal processes have
normalized. If you think justice is being served, it is not. We even have found
family members of the Judges being owners of banks or major shareholders.
In the State of Florida, a jury
trial is prohibited for foreclosure proceeding by Florida Statute allowing only
the Judges to reside, called a Judicial Hearing over the determination of the
cases. How can this even be constitutional?
What is amazing is that Thomas
Jefferson warned us about this so many years ago. He stated: “The opinion which
gives to the Judges the right to decide what laws are Constitutional and what
not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the
legislature and executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a
Despotic branch. The new Constitution
has secured these (individual rights) in the Executive and Legislative
departments; but not in the Judiciary. It should have established trials by the
people themselves, that is to say by jury.” Understand that he was writing
about the jury being the final arbiter at the Appellate levels just as it is most
often at the Circuit Court level.
In one case We The People v. United States, 485 F.3D 140 (2007), one Judge made the initial decision in the lawsuit to deny the right to petition the government for redress of grievances under the 1st Amendment, a group of 62 questions relating to the Federal individual Income Tax, the U.S. Government would not answer. A three Judge panel, including the now Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh upheld the usurpation and the SCOTUS refused to hear the case. https://openjurist.org/485/f3d/140/we-the-people-foundation-inc-v-united-states So, we had in this case, just “four” people determining if Citizens have the Right to petition the Government for Redress of Grievances under the 1st Amendment and expect honest answers to those questions. Siding with Kavanaugh was Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Chief Justice and District of Columbia Circuit Court Justice, Judith W. Rogers. The initial Judge in the lawsuit at the DC Circuit was Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. I call them the four henchmen for usurping one of the most necessary rights of all. Our founding fathers petitioned King George as well and with the same results.
The proverbial question is why have a right to petition the government
for redress of grievances, if the Government doesn’t have to honestly respond
to questions pertaining especially to the tax laws of our nation? If they
cannot answer such questions, how are they able to assess and enforce them?
It was the single most influential action taken by those in the
U.S. Government that made me come to the very sad but honest realization, as
those from Princeton University and other academics have concluded. That we are
an oligarchy and not a democratic republic any more, quashing the entire notion
of any possibility of representative democracy under our current leadership and
system. IMHO, it is the judiciary that provides the legal precedence that has slowly
allowed the expanded size and scope of powers beyond the constitutional limitations
set force in our rules of law. There are
legal and proper ways to amend our Constitution, yet the judiciary has ignored
them on many occasions, legislating from the Bench as each political Party
contends the other is doing. In all three of the above situations noted above,
it was the Judiciary single handedly that was the final arbiter fostering the
usurpation of rights protected by the Bill of Rights.
It simply comes down
to just nine people determining the laws for a nation of 325 million people;
two much power in the hands of too few individuals. With the negation of the
right to petition for redress of grievances, they have now blocked all of the
Citizens ability of any method(s) of direct oversight over those in judicial power,
as Thomas Jefferson warned so very long ago. You can vote your little hearts out and it
will have little bearing, these justices are nominated and confirmed by the
most politically powerful in our system.
The President and 100 Senators now decide our judicial fate.
Then we wonder
why the Government has grown from having just one tax, a luxury import tax, to taxing
everyone and everything we do with Gestapo like tactics, WWII Germany would be proud
of. Total government spending at all levels is now at $7.4 trillion “annually” and
we must borrow $1 trillion of that annually, now placing every household in
debt to the turn of about $175,000.00 with a total of just the Federal Government
debt now surpassing $22 trillion.
We are literally
indebting the future generations beyond their potential of paying it back
without debasing our currency even more.
Inflation has only been curbed by the poor economic conditions felt by everyone
but the wealthy who appear to be oblivious to the effects placed on the middle
to lower socio-economic spectrum.
With the Federal budget especially, but also state and local, if Citizens could pick and choose which social programs they want to pay for and how much they want to contribute to each one, it would at least give us some semblance of a democracy.
Look, there is no one greater than I that fears the voting majority because they are not being educated and there is no reason for the ruling class to educate them, and actually just the opposite. The stupider the voters are the more they can be taken advantage of.
With politicians making the decisions, knowing darn well they are serving the wealthy special interests instead of the majority, the benefits of our democratic republic are negated. We’re simply an oligarchy, controlled by wealthy special interests pretending to be a democratic Republic like the Roman Empire and ALL other nation-states before us.
Can you imagine politicians having to actually prove to the voters that a war is needed with the citizens getting to decide if the truth is really being told to us? Would we have engaged in Desert Storm or Syria?
We have the technology to do this, it’s the political will I am worried about. These putzes can’t even get a simple 1 man 1 vote election correct. That’s because sadly we have the inmates running the asylum; oh right, we’re calling it a swamp now. Elon Musk and SpaceX can send rockets into space and land them safely, and we can get a friggin computer system to count the votes correctly?
We must teach our children that all human and individual rights are inalienable.
We must teach our children what inalienable rights are and that they cannot be justly usurped.
We must teach our children that liberty is better than involuntary servitude.
We must teach our children that they, as individuals, are more important than the state and the common good.
We must teach our children that giving to others is one of the human actions that create joy and happiness.
We must teach our children that taxation is an economic form of involuntary servitude.
We must teach our children the protection of individual property rights is more important than the redistribution of wealth to serve the common good.
We must teach our children that self-defense, both from criminals and from the tyranny of the State is an ethical responsibility to both themselves and to others.
We must teach our children that their ethical behavior is paramount to a civil society.
We must teach our children that honesty and integrity are fundamentals of ethical behavior.
We must teach our children that aggressions such as force, coercion or fraud are unethical behaviors that give rise to the lawful concept and use of self-defense.
We must teach our children that the use of force and coercion are both reasonable and lawful rationales to assert self-defense.
We must teach our children that self-defense is sometimes a legitimate and necessary means to deter force and coercion.
We must teach our children the concepts of Natural Law and the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP).
We must teach our children that equal justice under the laws of human nature is a necessary foundation for a civil society.
We must teach our children that all human beings have the same individual and inalienable rights unless and only if they try to usurp the rights of others through aggression, coercion or fraud.
We must teach our children that the non-aggressive actions by others, even if they offend them must be tolerated and that tolerance is a virtue.
We must teach our children that their non-aggressive behaviors and communications may offend others, therefore consider carefully your actions and what you say before taking them or speaking.
We must teach our children to work hard and smart. To work with others under the various ethical conventions, such as the Law Merchant, our world offers and to attempt to seek and achieve those things that benefit mankind.
We much teach our children the Law Merchant and how and why it came to be.
We must teach our children to stand up for what they believe and do not intellectually back down from those who do not wish there to be a civility.
We must teach our children that not all those that seek positions of authority can be trusted to either be truthful or just.
We must teach our children that wisdom does not always come easily or quickly. That they must work hard to both gain the experience and the knowledge to achieve it.
We must teach our children the patients is truly a virtue and that others will often fail to choose it.
We must teach our children that the use of the phrase “We must teach our children” at the beginning of each sentence is redundant and unnecessary.
That the historical stories passed down to us are often skewed to protect the improprieties of those involved and that we all fall short of perfection.
That our actions, sometimes even the simplest can have profound effects on others and the world.
That the planet is not a trash can and that pollution is simply stuff being in the wrong place; make sure it gets in the right place.
To be skeptical of those religions that grant special privileges or rights to those who believe in their doctrines, over those that do not.
That morality is subjective and is how you choose to ethically live your life. That others have the right to chose how they ethically live their lives subject to however the NAP, not harming others or their property through the aggressions of force, coercion or fraud.
To love and to care for and about others and to be honest with both your heart and your actions.
That hurtful words cannot be taken back once they are stated and that withholding them is often a sign of wisdom and virtue.
Alfred Lord Tennyson; “Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.”
John Adams; “You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the great legislator of the universe.”
Thomas Jefferson; “A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.”
George Washington; “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force, like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”
So, the challenge to parents and educators; teach your children what is important and teach them the truth. I have a feeling that some of you may need to brush up a little on both.