Libertarianism can best be summed up as the legal inability of the bureaucracy and corporate powers to prey on the civilian population through taxation, regulations and fees, as legalized force and coercion are prohibited. All inalienable rights are equally protected by those within the entire population and equal justice under the law is best achieved as no privileges or preferences can be granted by the state to favor one individual over another individual or group. The system operates through voluntary associations and natural law via the non-aggression principle.
Socialism can best be summed up as the collusion of the bureaucracy and corporate powers attempts to take, through taxation, from the civilian population by giving some of that money they take, to those that vote for those politicians that are willing to tax the civilian population and redistribute their money to the bureaucracy and the wealthier special interests. Democracy and/or representative democracy are used to determine which inalienable rights are protected and which ones are usurped by the power structure. The system usually operates via a strong bureaucracy with the government-controlled courts using arbitrary determinations influenced by the various political ideologies with the most powerful political parties vying for power and control over taxation and the redistribution of wealth. Net Tax Recipients, those that get more money out of the public treasuries than they put in often vote against the Net Tax Payers, mostly those in the civilian population who put more money into the public treasuries than they take out.
Fascism can best be summed up as the collusion of state and corporate powers, using force and coercion to prey on the civilian population via massive amounts of taxation and regulatory fees, using strong armed police powers. Most inalienable rights end up being usurped as more taxes and regulatory fees are needed and enacted to feed through various redistribution of wealth schemes the continuously growing power structure. The system also operates via a massive bureaucracy with the government-controlled courts using arbitrary determinations influenced by the various political ideologies and most powerful political party(ies).
Communism can best be summed up as the bureaucracy of the most powerful political party preying on the workforce using force and coercion, via regulations and mandates to pay those within the most powerful political party. Few alienable or property rights exist, as the state. i.e. the pubic good and general welfare are legislatively and judicially deemed to have greater legal standing and priority over the rights of the individual. This system usually operates by a highly centralized bureaucracy administered by a single extremely powerful political party, using strong-armed police and military powers. Individual rights are sacrificed for the alleged good of the majority.
How grand of them to give us back our right to use the herb cannabis, they usurped eighty years ago, on October 2, 1937, House Bill 6385: The Marihuana Tax Act. Yet a large group of politicians still voted against it. Only 5 Republicans voted for it and 6 Democrats voted against the bill to decriminalize a naturally occurring herb that people have utilized for thousands of years, coincidentally during a period when many Marxists were, just so happened to be, infiltrating our government. Sadly, some are saying, it is “unlikely” to pass the Senate.
Think of our Constitution as our foundational rule of law, yet we have allowed it to be “unlawfully” abrogated to such a very high degree that many are making a strong case that we are no longer a lawfully constituted Republic. If true, is there a way to restore our society?
Are there viable solutions, has been the long-standing question and it appears playing in the arenas they control, the courts and legislatures, have been extremely futile. They surely are not going to ask somebody like me to be the Secretary of the Treasury, that’s reserved for the wealthy banking and investment interests. They obviously need the revenue or they wouldn’t be reinstating this right.
Qualified Immunity is one of the major problems. Even when a government employee or official usurps somebody’s rights, they have commandeered the Courts and they most often eliminate any liability. Even Big Pharma is exempted from liability through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that has already paid out over $4.4 billion, so far, in claims. Most people don’t know about this, so they would not even know to make a claim.
The Constitution clearly states, that those that break their Oaths to support, protect and defend the Constitution, “shall Not Hold Office” and many in both major political Parties, more like gangs today, are complicit. Many people such as the group who voted against reinstating the above right, are actually complicit in destroying the very Constitution they have taken an oath to uphold. This is by definition an insurrection. When two or more people are involved in an insurrection, it is “treason”. We The People and our government have literally been overthrown from within, by the two most powerful political gangs and they are both highly violent and corrupt.
The Constitution says they shall not hold office and,
It says that any monetary claim to Congress to put down an insurrection, if successful, shall not be challenged.
So the provisions of restoring our constituted provisions are4 in the Constitution itself. We just need a large enough group to restore it.
In the below link, Andrew Colesanti, a founding member of the Counter-Insurgency Studies and Observation Group (COINSOG) makes the case that Biden and Harris by virtue of them campaigning to “legislatively” void the 2nd Amendment, for the right to bear arms, have thus broken their Oaths and thus should not have placed themselves on the ballot for the election. The Constitution gives us two lawful methods of amending the Constitution and both Biden and Harris have not advocated these methods and instead, have and are still attempted to unlawfully subvert the Constitution and its intent to protect the rights of the Citizens through unlawful legislative means. https://therightofchoice.wordpress.com/?p=158
Can you imagine a large group of COINSOG Citizens arresting Biden and Harris for insurrection and treason and putting them on trial? Right now, there are not enough members and obviously, security and privacy are of great importance to both the usurpers and we the people if we partake in such civil actions. Or we can maintain the status quo that appears to be taking us down a potentially violent path of incoherent civil unrest.
2. The Right of Choice; the website to the above link is about creating a substitute tax return that allows the individual taxpayers to choose which government programs they want or do not want to pay for with their taxes. With over 120 different taxes and regulatory fees, the government surely has plenty of discretionary money to pay for the less popular programs. If the IRS denies the use of the substitute returns, which is likely, the taxpayers, simply removes that section from their return and refiles it to meet their perceived income tax obligations. If they deny the substitute returns, this of course provides the Citizens a very interesting legal and constitutional challenge through the courts. The publicity alone would be worth the effort and a much easier sell to the average American to join in the movement. Seeing who pushes back and their arguments against such an initiative will surely be enlightening.
This is a copy of the certified letter that has been sent to President Donald Trump. The purpose as you will read, is to report to him as required under the Constitution, any and all known insurrections, treasons, and plots against the United States or “the Laws thereof”. According to the Constitution and the following United States Statute, it is a crime for any elected official to ignore the evidence and do nothing about it. This Group has been around for almost 30 years and have experienced my examples of usurpations and criminal acts against the Citizens and laws of this country and have noticed numerous Presidents and other Public Officials of the crimes. It is now time for the Citizens to use the laws and Constitution to indict those involved. The question then becomes, how many are involved?
COUNTER INSURGENCY OBSERVATION & STUDIES GROUP (COINSOG)
8409 N. Oak River Way, Hernando, Florida 34442
To: Office of the President
Donald Trump, President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D. C., 20500
Title 18 U.S.C. § 2382 Notice of Misprision of Treason
Qualified claim by COINSOG for appropriations under the rules of necessity and delegated authority of the 9th Amendment and Section 4 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America to payments, bounties and pensions for services to put down rebellion and insurrection against the duly constituted Republic its Bill of Rights & Constitution.
Dear President Trump,
Referenced law requires anyone owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason or insurrections against the authority of the United States, or the laws thereof to make known the same to the President, some Judge of the United States, or to the Governor or Judges or Justices of a particular State. What I report to you is ongoing within the fifty States, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealths. I must report to you, that most all Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States except for the Honorable Justice Thomas, most Federal, State, County and local Public Officials, Judges, Justices and their paramilitaries have used public appropriations, their public offices, vacating their Oaths of Office intentionally in the process, to defy Federal and State laws with sufficient force and effect during times pertinent, so as to deny the power of the United States Constitution with their “Qualified Immunity” schemes. Thereby they, each of them, became insurgents against that Constitution as prescribed by Sections 3 (insurrection clause) and 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment using the definition of Federal case entitled, “In Re Charge to Grand Jury, N.D., Ill., 1894, 62 F. 828.”
It has become abundantly clear that all Federal, State, County and local Courts in America are exacting their qualified immunity schemes to bolster a Police State apparatus whose mission is to pacify the American civilian population into submission of usurped powers thereby creating an arbitrary government. This is evidence, that these Courts no longer serve to benefit the civilian populations, instead victimizing them by the arrogant and unlawful violations of their natural civil and constitutional rights, thereby an insurrection has taken hold. Therefore, the best course of action is a counter insurgency under Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment directed at those cited in Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment who have violated or vacated their Oaths of Office, thereby they shall not hold office.
We the People have heard all the arguments in favor of qualified immunity, however not one argument negates the fact that it is insurrection, treason and conspiracy by Public Officials within the Judiciary that gave unchecked force to their paramilitaries in order to capriciously victimize the American civilian population. We all now witness the overwhelming call by segments of the civilian population and Public Officials to de-fund and even abolish police primarily because of the protections extended to them by the treasonous qualified immunity scheme. This matter Mr. President could be defused simply by the execution of an Presidential Executive Order abolishing qualified immunity, restructuring of police duties, and responsibilities and not as paramilitaries.
Then there is the pressing question; “is America a duly constituted Republic or has it become a Police State Junta” with minimal protections of individual rights? Not unlike those brutal Juntas that were trained at the Old School of the Americas, WINSEC or of late American paramilitaries trained by the IDF in classic violent military pacification of civilian populations to force them into submission of usurpation’s, notwithstanding the Bill of Rights and Constitution.
The arming of the current Police State Apparatus with military arms and implements of war became apparent with the enactment of the Gun Control ACT of May 1986 as the treasonous disarming of peaceful American civilians took hold as if it was a war upon their natural civil and constitutional rights. This has become the status quo, strengthened by the insurgent’s qualified immunity scheme. Then there is the fact that nowhere within the text of the 2nd Amendment can one find the phrase “but in a manner to be prescribed by law” evidencing why the usurpers covet their treasonous blanket of qualified immunity.
Coupled with qualified immunity “bound by an oath of office” as defined in the COINAGE ACT, a blanket bond scheme was developed, solely intended to pass the financial liability of bad actors in public office and their para-military enforces onto the taxpayers, thus unlawfully indemnifying themselves from personal liability. There has been debate about whether or not any civilian uprising against the aforementioned treasonous insurgents cited within Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th would be rebellion or insurrection against a duly constituted authority, in of itself? The best qualified answer we have found to this question is: EXCERPT’ reason for the militia; “to stand against any arbitrary government and its usurped powers as reiterated by Supreme Court Justice Story in Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States Vol. 3 at pp. 746-747 (1833). It is surely reasonable to conclude that in a nation with fundamental liberties, a direct remedy must be afforded those victimized, coerced and harassed by these insurgents and their para-military protectors.
Evidence of an insurrection is well documented, from within the various government bodies, using the qualified immunity scheme to deny the liberty and justice, intended by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. So now the question is, “has government at all levels become arbitrary?” The answer to this pressing question lies within but not limited to the following facts: two former Presidents were served with Notice of Misprision of Treason by members of COINSOG, as it relates to the courts they chose to aid and abet by their inactions. COINSOG members also brought forth cases citing insurrection, treason, and conspiracy into U.S. District Courts within several states of the union, again to no avail. Those states were New Mexico, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Texas, South Dakota as well as the SCOTUS, even though early law required as mandatory “not discretionary” the SCOTUS review all cases citing insurrection. Then we have the fact “Congress knew or should have known of the unconstitutional qualified immunity schemes and the negative impact it would and has had on the civilian population, many of whom rot in jails who have and are denied their constitutional rights. Not one meaningful or honest attempt from within has occurred to stop the ongoing insurrection and treason from within. “Thereby it can be said an arbitrary government has indeed taken hold.”
All of America who care to observe, as well as the members of the Counter Insurgency Studies & Observation Group (COINSOG) have witnessed countless court cases brought forth by victims of the insurgent’s unjust qualified immunity schemes to “try” to establish accountability for the ongoing usurpations of their natural civil and constitutional rights, only too further suffer from the “qualified immunity scheme used to deny, again and again any liability or accountability whatsoever and it still continues.”
Even you Mr. President, I truly suspect, was unaware of those engaged in the insurrection and treason, as it relates to “RED FLAG LAWS”. The MO was seizing the guns first from honest Citizens and worry about the due process later. However, how are we the people to expect due process of law, while the blanket of treasonous qualified immunity is protected by our courts and instead, used by usurpers to trample upon the natural, civil and constitutional rights of the America population?
I would be remis if I did not point out, there are other insurgents and their component forces at work 24-7, some of which are allegedly led by convicted Marxist terrorist, one of many terrorists pardoned by BILL CLINTON and ruthlessly targeting you Mr. President and the segment of America that supports you. The time has arrived to not only invoke Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment, to route out those insurgents who have disavowed their oaths of office, as cited in Section 3 (insurrection clause) of the 14th Amendment and the INSURRECTION ACT. To route out all insurgent component forces that threaten not only you Mr. President, but the election process, and the duly constituted Republic, its Bill of Rights, Constitution and those American’s who support you.
In conclusion: Mr. President, common sense dictates, no one wants civil unrest, a civil war or perhaps a revolution. We must stop the usurpations exacted by embedded insurgents from within our own government and their component forces and the social unrest it is causing across the nation. If we do nothing” it will likely continue. The only logical and more peaceable path left to the American civilian population is to invoke Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment under the rules of necessity and delegated authority of the 9th Amendment. Thereby “COINSOG defined, as other armed forces of the United States of America”, reiterates its claim to payments, bounties, and pensions to put down the identified insurrection under Section 4 (bounty clause) of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America.
Dying “of” Coronavirus or Dying “with” Coronavirus appears to be quite subjective, especially here in the U.S.In counties over 100 million in population we are the worst in both number of cases and deaths as of 05/18/2020. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countriesWe pretty much the worst of all the countries in the world?
This is a famous sermon by the Rev. Charles Robinson, who just happens to be an ancestor, in 1865 memorializing Abraham Lincoln after his assassination.
The reason, however, I published the sermon is because of its illumination of the Venetian Conspirators noted in the 1st paragraph on page 4. (see below) He was a beautiful author and wordsmith, better than most I’ve heard and I see why he was so popular in his day.
Apparently, it is impossible to place mortal humans in positions of political power by any means, election, appointment or by their own overt actions that can effectively vote themselves the ability to restrain their own powers and influences. It may be a slow expansion of powers but none the less in total a significant one.
In 8,000 years of recorded history, do we know of any culture that has been able to place enough people with integrity into positions of political power that have successfully protected the inalienable rights and property of their fellow Citizens?
Representative government is, thus far, an elusion that has always placed money and power ahead of the majorities best interest. How quickly a portion of the electorate will attempt to overthrow the majority once they realize they can indirectly vote themselves greater benefits through their representatives, at the expense of their own Citizens, often determines the long term economic fate of their society.
It appears to me we have reached this phase in U.S. history. As many countries have found, it is easy to destroy free-market capitalism with enough taxation, regulation, and bureaucracy. It however thus far alludes us in finding a better replacement.
Paloma Funds, Donald Sussman, CEO, $21,613,800 campaign contribution. The is the founder and Chief Investment Officer of the Paloma Funds and the founder of New China Capital Management LLC. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Hall, a member of the Board of Directors of ProPublica, and an Honorary Trustee of the Ethical Culture Fieldston School. His company Paloma Partners, was the largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 . Sussman was born to a Jewish family in June 1946, the son of Beatrice (née Zimmerman) and William Sussman. His father was a real estate developer.They were the single largest individual contributors to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016
Renaissance Technologies, James Harris Simons Founder and Chairman $16,543,000 campaign contribution. James Harris Simons was born on April 25, 1938 to an American Jewish family, the only child of Marcia (née Kantor) and Matthew Simons, and raised in Brookline, Massachusetts. His father owned a shoe factory. When James Simons was a teenager, he worked a job in the basement stockroom of a garden supply store. His inefficiency at the job resulted in his demotion as a floor sweeper., Renaissance was the 3rd largest individual contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .
Saban Capital Group, Haim Saban $12,283,411 campaign contribution is an American investment firm based in Los Angeles, California focused on media, entertainment, and communications investments. Formed in 2010 Saban Capital Group owns Saban Films, part of Univision Communications, and part of Celestial Tiger Entertainment. He was a part owner of FOX Entertainments, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Israeli American Council. Saban Capital was the 4th largest individual contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .
Newsweb Corporation. Fred Eychaner, $11,016,642 campaign contribution, (born c. 1945) is an American entrepreneur and philanthropist.Eychaner is the Chairman of Newsweb Corporation. He was included in Chicago magazine’s 2014 list of the 100 most powerful Chicagoans. In 2005, the Chicago Tribune estimated his wealth at $500 million. In 2015, he was inducted into the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame.Eychaner is a major donor to Democratic campaigns, gay rights advocacy groups, and arts organizations. m Newweb was the 5th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016 .
Soros Fund Management George Soros $10,556,793 campaign contribution is a private American investment management firm. It is currently structured as a family office but formerly as a hedge fund. The firm was founded in 1969 by George Soros and in 2010 was reported to be one of the most profitable firms in the hedge fund industry, averaging a 20% annual rate of return over four decades. They are headquartered at 250 West 55th Street in New York. Soros was born in Budapest in the Kingdom of Hungary to a prosperous non-observant Jewish family, who, like many upper-middle class Hungarian Jews at the time, were uncomfortable with their roots. Soros has wryly described his home as a Jewish antisemitic home. The Soros Fund was the 6th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.
ASANA, Justin Rosenstein and Dustin Moskovitz formally a co-founder of Facebook. $6,005,556 campaign contribution. Allegedly, Providence, Rhode Island runs an efficient government with Asana who provides workspace management software resources to public and private entities. Asana was the 6th largest individual contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Lone Pine Capital. Steven Mandel $5,015,300 campaign contribution is an American-based hedge fund headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut, established in 1997 by its president and portfolio manager, Stephen Mandel. The firm has offices in London, New York City, and San Francisco. They were the 8th largest contributor to the campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Almost all the above information came from either Wikipedia or the company website and the contributions from http://www.OpenSecrets.org
Bundlers are people with
friends in high places who, after bumping against personal contribution limits,
turn to those friends, associates, and, well, anyone who’s willing to give, and
deliver the checks to the candidate.
The Federal Election Commission
requires disclosure only of those bundlers who are registered lobbyists. Beyond
that, it’s up to the candidate. The Clinton campaign is releasing information
about bundlers who raised over $100,000 (see list below); the campaign does not
specify how much each of these individuals has raised beyond that. The Trump
campaign has released no information about its bundlers whatsoever.
Together, 1,129 Extremely wealthy were directing at least
$112,300,000 for Clinton’s election efforts — money that has gone into the
coffers of her campaign as well as the Democratic National Committee.
Lawyers & Lobbyists, $21.9M,
Unknown, $22.3M, Misc Business, $19M, Other, $17.2M, Defense, $100K, Labor,
$100K, Transportation, $900K, Agribusiness, $1.2M, Construction, $1.4M, Energy
& Natural Resources, $2M, Ideological/Single-Issue, $2.7M, Health, $5M, Communications/Electronics,
$13.9M, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate, $31.5M, Top Economic Sectors of
Clinton Bundlers, 2016
Top Industries of Clinton Bundlers
# of Bundlers
“Contributions” column indicates the total amount that the bundlers
and their spouses have given to all federal candidates, parties and PACs in all
election cycles since 1990.
For those that have never heard of it, you’ll see later why it’s “not” something the two major political parties and mainstream media want us to talk about or discuss its merits.
The NAP, as it is often referred to, is a philosophical legal
concept which precludes individuals from harming other individuals or their
justly acquired property, with the exception of protecting themselves and/or others
and their justly acquired property from someone else who is breaking the NAP. Simply, you’re not supposed to harm others or
their property and if you do, they have the legal right of self-defense to stop
This is actually the underlying basis of most modern-day legal systems in our world. So of course, you believe in it, right? Most laws are based on this ethical principle of not harming one another called “mala in se” laws and when people do break one of the laws we classify them as a criminal.
From Wikipedia: Malum
in se (plural Mala in se) is a Latin phrase meaning wrong or evil in itself. The phrase is used to refer to conduct assessed as sinful
or inherently wrong by nature, independent of regulations governing the
conduct. It is distinguished from malum prohibitum, which is wrong only because it is prohibited by political mandate.
Now here is the problem or really a dilemma with the NAP. It doesn’t necessarily apply to those individuals who represent and/or work for the nation-state, i.e. the government. The nation-state can simply enact mala in se and mala prohibitum laws and use force and coercion to enforce them. All your drug laws, vices such as prostitution, gambling, and alcohol, DUI, licensure laws such as driver and real estate licensing, permits, income taxes, public education, property taxes, etc. are all laws that break the NAP. They must use the force of coercion to enforce them or the Citizens would simply ignore them. Of course, the government will fine or incarcerate those that break the various laws, hence the use of force or coercion as the physical means of enforcement. I think it is pretty evident that everyone agrees that malum in se laws should be rigorously enforced but malum prohibitum laws is where the debates and differences of opinion really become apparent.
Their enforcement requires the use of force or coercion by those in the nation-state to carry out the politically derived mandates. They must physical steal or coerce people into giving them the money it requires to fulfil the governments social policies.
It’s not OK for an individual to break the NAP, but those who form the largest or most powerful political party and their employees can and do. I’m not here to try to determine right and wrong at this point or what laws we should or shouldn’t have, I’m here is help people understand the principle and how it affects our lives. Later I share what a few of our founding fathers said.
Every tax, fine or regulatory fee is a breach of the NAP because it
takes money or property from those who justly earned it and thus it “Rightfully”
belongs to and gives it those that didn’t justly earn it and thus it does NOT rightfully
belong to. This is the ethical foundation of our “Inalienable Rights” and why the
Citizens required a Bill of Rights be created before they would ratify the U.S.
Constitution. These rights were specifically
to stop those in government from taking the Citizens money and enacting malum
Of course, those in government have twisted the very words in the Bill of Rights and Constitution where today government just about goes unstrained in both size and scope of powers. Instead of check and balances between the three branches, they are either rubber-stamping one another’s decisions and actions or suing one another when they breach or overstep their constitutionally mandated scope of powers. The various branches of our government and those individuals in the bureaucracy are in constant legal battles. The Federal government alone cost taxpayers over $4 trillion “annually” and requires over 110 different taxes and regulatory fees to pay for it all.
To give you an idea of what our founding fathers set out to establish
with our founding documents, all one must do is to read a few of the quotes of
the first three Presidents.
Thomas Jefferson, the Third President “A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.
George Washington, the First President “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force! Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”
John Adams, the Second President “You have
rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or
restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the
One of the most important rights is that of “property”
protected by our Constitution as well as the NAP. How
have we gone from a society set up to protect our property and money from being
confiscated by criminals and the government, to one where the government is now
the greatest confiscator?
The greater questions are 1. can government be
restrained from confiscating to much of the majority’s wealth and if so 2. how
do we do it when it starts to cause such great problems for the majority and
our society as a whole?
As the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) on Wednesday the 31st of July, 2019 lowered the discount rate to 2% to 2.25%, 1/4 point lower from 2.25% to 2.50% I couldn’t help but think of the real underlying cause. The lowering of this rate even a 1/4 point indicates the greatest economy in U.S. history as President Trump and no one else is claiming, because it’s simply far from the truth. This has been one of the worst financial recoveries in U.S. history and we are really really far from being out of the proverbial hot water.
First, if the economy was booming as Trump triumphantly decries, the FRB would still be trying to normalize rates by continuing to raise them. Nor would they have recently stopped selling the over $4 trillion in Treasuries and MBS’s on their balance sheet as they were doing. This is the actions of an FRB trying to preempt a recession, also understanding major components within the Treasury Yield Curve remains inverted, another reliable indicator of a coming recession.
The concept and legislative enactments of allowing Government to both print and borrow money is a “really” horrible idea, that will eventually bankrupt our society. The fact that no society in history has been able to curtain their government from bankrupting their society is surely evidence of how horrible an idea this has been.
If it were a unique situation, it would be one thing, but the fact it is one of the more common occurrences prompting both long term depressions and total social failures should give us a clue to their devastating effects. Almost every major industrialized government in the world today has experienced this. In 1989, the United Soviet Socialists Republic became the largest government to have done this to their people, so big and mighty does not equate to Prosperity. You may not know it but the Roman Empire even bankrupted its government and society.
With government printing and or borrowing the fact that a generation or two may escape the catastrophic results does not limit the pain for many, as the resultant periods of inflation ravish especial the young and old with low and fixed incomes. Thinking that a group of people are any more responsible than an individual is obviously foolish and one could argue just the opposite.
Understand that government is supposed to be a projection of our own humanity as a community. An individual surely cannot print their own money nor borrow without limits, yet we have allowed our politicos to do both on our behalf.
Because of the long-term catastrophic results, there is no justifiable reason, not even to fund a war or increased military defense. Matter of fact, a bankrupted society becomes an easier target than does an underdefended society especially from being overthrown from within. The fact that there are now many underdefended countries that have survived over long periods also negates this rationale.
From my own study, especially in the more modern times it appears to me governments are now taking positions with groups of other countries working together to overthrow heads or State and destabilize various countries who they have economic or social conflicts with, so mankind is really not doing the mass evasion strategy that requires massive expenditures any more. WWII was supposed to be the war to end all wars as also told to us about WWI. Then you have the ill effects of the guns or butter principle as the U.S. and other big defense spenders are experiencing today. Will we ever learn?
I could only think of one potential cause to allow a government to expand the money supply via borrowing or printing. If someone were to invent a low-cost energy source requiring an initial high capital investment that just could not be funded by the private sector, that would be a reasonable use of the funds because it would be a one-time investment and it would lower the costs of energy making the payback of the investment plausible. Most economists today understand both U.S. and world debt today will never be paid back and as such, and thus more printing and borrowing is only differing eventual default.
So, if you wonder why the U.S. is now the largest debtor nation in world history with approximately 1/3 of our society living at or near the poverty line, simply ask a member of Congress and wait for the proverbial baloney and nonsense to come spewing out of their mouths. They have always been very good at coming up with a rationale for both printing and borrowing money and their pensions and personal growth in wealth are the real proof of why they do it. The numbers do not lie though that prove printing and borrowing money by the government are bad for the majority.